One of my favorite scriptures is Ecclesiastes 3:
For everything there is a season, and a time for every matter under heaven
A time to be born, and a time to die;
A time to plant, and a time to pluck up what is planted.
Etc.
On this particularly difficult Fourth of July, with a current unbridgeable cultural chasm, likely worsened by recent Supreme Court decisions, and civil disorder just over the horizon, let me add to Ecclesiastes: There is a time for extremism and a time for moderation.
Extremism has a place in Brethren theology. Brethren are zealous for Jesus, and their devotion to the church is unswerving. Brethren are intolerant of injustice.
But sometimes Brethren best contribute to their society and country by exuding balance and peacemaking. In these troubled times, voices that pour oil on trouble waters are especially valuable. We need more citizens who respect the other side and who understand that political opponents have legitimate points, even if in the end they are still wrong.
Perhaps the call to moderation is difficult. Extremism can be fulfilling and gratifying, providing a purpose to life that moderation simply cannot. Classical socialism, for example, has dogma and can be exegeted endlessly, like religion. A ringing call to action—“To the barricades”—gets the blood flowing. Moderation, on the other hand, by its very nature is tempered and restrained. It cools rather than inflames, and, therefore, rings less loudly than a rallying cry. Moderation doesn’t work on a bumper sticker.
Despite its complexity, moderation may come readily for many Brethren. Recognizing the dignity of all and respectful treatment of those with whom we disagree is a hallmark of traditional Brethren demeanor. For all the nonconformity of the early Brethren, gentleness characterized their stereotype, and many modern Brethren still exhibit this trait. It stems from love for all, including those on the other side of the political aisle, and a determined distance from the worldly kingdom, especially secular political parties and movements.
This is not an appeal for luke-warm faith, for Both Sides-ism, or for retrenchment on vital concerns of justice but instead a reflection on how we carry ourselves in the public debate. The call is for a strong faith that produces a complicated Goldilocks public stance—not too hot, not too cold—and imbued with balance and stability.
Hopefully, relatively few Brethren have caught the disease of public incivility, and they can simply continue doing their thing. May a stiff backbone undergird their gentleness and provide strength to withstand the intimidating climate of current public debate.
For everything there is a season, and on this Fourth of July it is time for quiet, unassuming, humble, steadfast-in-the-faith Dunker peacemakers to witness moderation.

This should be easy for many Brethren. Too bad there aren’t more of them.
Dr. Stephen Longenecker, Ph.D. is the Edwin L. Turner Distinguished Professor of History at Bridgewater College, and author of six books, including Gettysburg Religion: Refinement, Diversity, and Race in the Antebellum and Civil War Border North. Stephen serves as a distinguished historian in the Church of the Brethren and an expert voice on Brethren in early America